Bombay High Court
BAPTISTA FRANCISCO VAZ ALIAS BAPTISTA FRANCIS VAZversusNOLDRED PETER VAZ AND 2 ORS
- Disposal
- Disposed of
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the prayer did not survive due to the efflux of time.
Summary
The petitioner, Baptista Francisco Vaz, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking relief against the respondents. The petition was argued by Advocate Abhishek Sawant. The court examined whether the petition remained maintainable in view of the passage of time since the cause of action arose. It was observed that the prayer in the writ petition had become time-barred and therefore could not be entertained. Consequently, the court held that the petition was infructuous and disposed of it without granting any relief.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable despite the lapse of time affecting the prayer sought
Subjects
- writ petition
- lapse of time
- infructuous
- high court
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-GOA:1663
10 WP 728 2026
Amrut
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.728 OF 2026
BAPTISTA FRANCISCO VAZ ALIAS
BAPTISTA FRANCIS VAZ ... PETITIONER
Versus
NOLDRED PETER VAZ AND 2 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Abhishek Sawant, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM:- S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED :- 19th August, 2026
P.C.:
1. Learned Advocate appearing for Petitioner informs that by
efflux of time, the prayer in writ petition does not survive.
2. In this view of the matter, writ petition stands disposed of
as infructuous.
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
Signed by: TARI AMRUT NAGESH
Designation: Private Secretary
Page 1 of 1
Date: 19/08/2026 14:42:43
19th August, 2026
Checking your session…