Bombay High Court
SAMPAT GANPAT WANVEversusAMBADAS GANPAT VANVE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the passage of time.
Summary
The petitioner, Sampat Ganpat Wanve, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the respondents, Ambadas Ganpat Vanve and others. The petition was argued by Advocate Vivek Bhavthankar on behalf of the petitioner, while Advocate S.J. Salunke represented the respondents. The petitioner contended that the petition should be entertained despite the lapse of time. The Court examined whether the delay rendered the petition ineffective. Relying on the principle that undue delay can make a petition infructuous, the Court held that the passage of time had indeed rendered the petition infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable despite the delay in filing?
Subjects
- writ petition
- limitation
- infructuous
- dismissal
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38296
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
56 WRIT PETITION NO. 7343 OF 2015
Sampat Ganpat Wanve
VERSUS
Ambadas Ganpat Vanve And Others
.......
Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. S.J. Salunke, Advocate for R.No.1 to 10
....…
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 24th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits
that, by passage of time, the present petition is rendered infructuous. As
such, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
fmp/-
Checking your session…