Bombay High Court

PADMINBAI LALASAHEB HANDE AND ANOTHERversusMADHAV BABASAHEB HANDE

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous because of the delay.

Summary

Petitioners Padminbai Lalasaheb Hande & others filed a writ petition in 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was pending for an extended period. On 1 September 2026, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the passage of time rendered the petition infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and held that the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to the lapse of time

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
delay
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39788



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                               WRIT PETITION NO.7349 OF 2015


            Padminbai Lalasaheb Hande & anr.                    … PETITIONERS

                     VERSUS

            Madhav Babasaheb Hande (Gaikwad)                    … RESPONDENT

                                               .......
            Mr. T.M. Venjane,Advocate for petitioners
            Mr. P.P. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent
                                               ....…

                                      CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                      DATE      : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2026

            PER COURT :


                         Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits

            that, by passage of time, the present petition is rendered infructuous. As

            such, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.




                                                   (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)




            fmp/-

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…