Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

WAMANRAO VINAYAKRAO SHEPversusKAMLAKAR RAMBHAU GANDAL AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn in accordance with the petitioner's instruction.

Summary

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 735 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, on 13 August 2026, the petitioner issued a written instruction indicating a desire to discontinue the proceedings. The court recorded this instruction and, after considering the withdrawal, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were adjudicated. The order reflects the procedural rule that a petition may be dismissed when the petitioner withdraws the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can dismiss a writ petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's express instruction to discontinue the proceedings

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • High Court
  • procedural law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39962



                                                                        63 WP No.735.2015
                                                   -1-

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 735 OF 2015

                                   WAMANRAO VINAYAKRAO SHEP
                                            VERSUS
                              KAMLAKAR RAMBHAU GANDAL AND OTHERS
                                                  ***
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Bipinchandra K. Patil h/f Mr.
              Vinayak M. Kagne
              Advocate for Respondents No. 6 to 9 : Mr. Mahesh R. Sonwane
                                                  ***

                                   CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                      Date : 2nd September, 2026

              PER COURT :-


              1.               The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on

              record copy of written instruction dated 13.08.2026 issued by the

              petitioner and submitted that petitioner does not want to proceed

              with the matter further. The said communication is taken on record

              and marked as Marked as 'X' for identification.



              2.              In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed

              as withdrawn.



                                                         (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)



              Omkar Joshi


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.