Bombay High Court
DIVISIONAL TRAFFIC SUPERINTENDENT MSRTC AND ANRversusSHRI GORAKH JALINDER KALKUMBHE
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because the main proceedings had already been concluded by the Industrial Court.
Summary
The petitioners, Divisional Traffic Superintendent M.S.R.T.C., Solapur and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging an order affecting Shri Gorakh Jalinder Kalkumbhe. The petition alleged that the relief sought was still required. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that the substantive dispute had already been resolved by the Industrial Court. Consequently, the petition was deemed infructuous because the main proceedings were disposed of. The Court, after noting the petition's lack of remaining purpose, ordered its disposal. The writ petition was therefore dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the substantive dispute has been finally resolved by another forum?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- Industrial Court
- Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
- High Court
Judgment
WP 7360 24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7360 OF 2024
DIVISIONAL TRAFFIC SUPERINTENDENT M.S.R.T.C., SOLAPUR AND
ANOTHER
VERSUS
SHRI GORAKH JALINDER KALKUMBHE
…
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Yashodeep Deshmukh a/w Adv. Gurubala
Birajdar a/w Adv. Vaidehi Deshmukh
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 01.10.2026
PER COURT :
Not on board. Taken on board, on mentioning.
2. Learned counsel Mr. Birajdar h/f Mr. Deshmukh for the petitioner
informs that main proceedings disposed of by the Industrial Court and the
petition has become infructuous.
3. Writ Petition is disposed of as become infructuous.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
Checking your session…