Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DIVISIONAL TRAFFIC SUPERINTENDENT MSRTC AND ANRversusSHRI GORAKH JALINDER KALKUMBHE

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because the main proceedings had already been concluded by the Industrial Court.

Summary

The petitioners, Divisional Traffic Superintendent M.S.R.T.C., Solapur and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging an order affecting Shri Gorakh Jalinder Kalkumbhe. The petition alleged that the relief sought was still required. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that the substantive dispute had already been resolved by the Industrial Court. Consequently, the petition was deemed infructuous because the main proceedings were disposed of. The Court, after noting the petition's lack of remaining purpose, ordered its disposal. The writ petition was therefore dismissed as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the substantive dispute has been finally resolved by another forum?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • Industrial Court
  • Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                WP 7360 24.odt

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 7360 OF 2024

     DIVISIONAL TRAFFIC SUPERINTENDENT M.S.R.T.C., SOLAPUR AND
                                    ANOTHER
                                     VERSUS
                    SHRI GORAKH JALINDER KALKUMBHE
                                        …
     Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Yashodeep Deshmukh a/w Adv. Gurubala
                      Birajdar a/w Adv. Vaidehi Deshmukh

                       CORAM                :   SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                       DATE                 : 01.10.2026


PER COURT :

        Not on board. Taken on board, on mentioning.

2.      Learned counsel Mr. Birajdar h/f Mr. Deshmukh for the petitioner
informs that main proceedings disposed of by the Industrial Court and the
petition has become infructuous.

3.      Writ Petition is disposed of as become infructuous.



                                        ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)




mkd/-




                                                                           1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.