Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AARYA AVINASH PATILversusMAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES NASHIK AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The court may correct clerical errors in the record of appearances without prejudice to the parties.

Summary

The Bombay High Court, hearing Writ Petition No. 7366 of 2026, identified clerical errors in the recorded appearances in the judgment dated 31 August 2026. It corrected the appearance of Respondent No. 2’s counsel from “BMC” to “NMC”, and deleted an incorrectly listed counsel for the petitioner. The court then directed that the judgment and order be corrected accordingly. No substantive issues of the petition were addressed; the order was purely procedural. The correction was made to ensure the accuracy of the court record.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may correct erroneous entries of counsel appearances in its judgment and order.

Subjects

  • court procedure
  • record correction
  • appearance of counsel
  • writ petition

Judgment

                                                           1                     P1-wp-7366-2026.doc


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 7366 OF 2026

                   Aarya Avinash Patil                                         ...Petitioner
                            Vs.
                   Maharashtra University of Health
                   Sciences Nashik and Others                                   ...Respondents
                                                  -----------------

                   Ms. Ayesha Qureshi, for the Petitioner.
                   Mr. Kunjan Makwana a/w. Mr. Ganesh K. Gole, for Respondent No.2
                   (NMC).
                                                     -----------------


                                                    CORAM :          R. I. CHAGLA AND
                                                                     FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.

                                                    DATED        : 2nd SEPTEMBER, 2026

                   P.C.:-
      Digitally
      signed by
      MAMTA
MAMTA AMAR
AMAR KALE
KALE  Date:
      2026.09.02
      17:49:13
      +0530
                   1.             Not on board. Mentioned, taken on board.

                   2.             By this praecipe bearing today’s date, the learned Counsel for

                   Respondent No.2 has sought for speaking to the minutes of the Judgement

                   and Order dated 31st August 2026. In the appearance column, appearance

                   for Respondent No.2 has been wrongly recorded as “Mr. Ganesh Gole, for

                   Respondent No.2 – BMC”.          The appearance shall be corrected as “Mr.

                   Ganesh Gole, for Respondent No.2 – NMC”.

                   3.             In appearance for the Petitioner, Mr. Aman Bodke has been


                    Mamta Kale                                                                   1/2
                                    2                     P1-wp-7366-2026.doc


wrongly included as his appearance is shown for Respondent No.3.

Accordingly, appearance of Mr. Aman Bodke for the Petitioner is deleted.

4.            The Judgement and Order dated 31st August 2026 is

accordingly corrected.



     [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.]                         [R.I. CHAGLA, J.]




 Mamta Kale                                                                2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.