Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUKARYA HARI GAWAD DECD THRU LHRS AND ORSversusNARAYAN NATHU PATIL DECD THRU LHRS AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, but failed to pursue the proceedings. The court observed that the petitioner had lost interest in prosecuting the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were examined. The dismissal was pronounced by Justice Aarti Sathe on 1 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

  • non-prosecution
  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                      14 - WP-7421-2023.DOC



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                     WRIT PETITION NO. 7421 OF 2023

Sukarya Hari Gawad Decd Thru
Lhrs and Ors                                                                Petitioners

      Versus
Narayan Nathu Patil Decd
Thru Lhrs and Ors                                                        Respondents
                                    WITH
                        WRIT PETITION NO. 7189 OF 2023

Sukarya Hari Gawad Decd.
Thr. Lhrs Bharti Yadav
Gawad and Ors                                                               Petitioners

      Versus
Narayan Nathu Patil Decd.
Thr. Lhrs Damayanti More
Shwar Patil and Ors                                                      Respondents
                                       _______
None for the Petitioners.
Ms. Aarya Alavani h/f Mr. Jayesh Joshi, Advocates, for Respondent Nos. 10 and 13.
Ms. Dhruti Kapadia, AGP for State.
                                       _______

                            CORAM:          AARTI SATHE, J.

                            DATE:           1st SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C.

1.          None for the Petitioner.

2.          It appears that the Petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the

Petition.

3.          Writ Petition is dismissed for want of non-prosecution.




                                                      (AARTI SATHE, J.)


                                   Page 1 of 1
Bharati


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.