Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ABHISHEK MAHENDRA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioner abandoned the proceedings.

Summary

Abhishek Mahendra Singh filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. After the hearing on 10 March 2022, the petitioner and his counsel failed to appear or take any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the judges held that the petition was abandoned. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • abandonment
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                    50-wp749.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 749 OF 2021

            Abhishek Mahendra Singh                                    …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                            …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Shri. Ajay Patil APP, for the Respondent-State.
                               ____________________________________

                                              CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE :      29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, after 10th March, 2022, neither the

            Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

            even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                         (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                         1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:04 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.