Bombay High Court
MURLIDHAR ANANT THAKUR AND ORSversusKAMLAKAR NARAYAN SAMANT (DECEASED THROUGH LRS) GYNESH KAMLAKAR SAMANT AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a 22 April 2010 order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, which had dismissed their revision and upheld the Tahsildar's decision rejecting their claim as deemed purchasers. The petitioners failed to appear at multiple hearings scheduled on 27 July 2026, 10 August 2026, and 17 August 2026. The court noted the petitioners' apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for non‑prosecution and vacated any interim relief that had been granted. The order was signed digitally by the presiding judge.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural consequence when a petitioner fails to appear for a scheduled hearing in a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution dismissal
- deemed purchaser
- Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal
- procedural default
Judgment
2-WP-752-2011.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 752 OF 2011
Murlidhar Anant Thakur And Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus
NAVNATH
SITARAM Kamlakar Narayan Samant (deceased Through ...Respondents
WAGHMARE Lrs) Gynesh Kamlakar Samant And Anr.
****
Digitally signed
by NAVNATH None for the Petitioners.
SITARAM
WAGHMARE Mr. A.A. Alaspurkar AGP the Respondent/State.
Date: 2026.08.17
18:16:21 +0530 Ms. Gauri Bhagwat i/b M/s Divekar Bhagwat & Co. for the Respondent
No.1.
****
CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.
DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :
1. On 27.07.2026, the following order was passed:
“1. None for the Petitioners. Learned counsel for the Respondent
No.1 seeks time to take instructions.
2. Petitioners are challenging the order dated 22.04.2010 passed
by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai dismissing his revision
application, confirming order of Tahsildar, Borivali rejecting the
claim of Petitioners as deemed purchasers.
3. Stand over to 10.08.2026 as an opportunity to Petitioners or
their advocate to appear and contest.”
2. On 10.08.2026, the following order was passed:
“1. On last occasion, the matter was adjourned as an opportunity
to the Petitioners. Today also, none is appearing for the
Petitioners.
2. Stand over to 17.08.2026. To be listed ‘for dismissal’.”
Navnath Waghmare 1
2-WP-752-2011.doc
3. Today, the matter is listed for dismissal, however, nobody is
appearing for the Petitioner. It appears that the Petitioner is not
interested in proceeding with the matter.
4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim/ ad-interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
5. All concerned to act on duly authenticated or digitally signed
copy of this order.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.)
Navnath Waghmare 2
Checking your session…