Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANJAY JANKU NARALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary

Sanjay Janku Narale filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 77 of 2023 against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that, after filing a ‘B’ Summary, the matter had become infructuous. The court, noting the submission, disposed of the petition as infructuous without further hearing. No substantive issues on the merits were addressed. The petition was therefore dismissed as moot.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous

Subjects

  • criminal writ petition
  • infructuous
  • petition dismissed
  • mootness

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43185-DB

                                                        920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 77 OF 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 77 OF 2023

                                          Sanjay Janku Narale
                                                 Versus
                                  The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                    __________________________________________________________
                   Adv. Kapil Sanjay Gaikwad h/f. Adv. Awasarmol Rahul O.
                   for the Petitioner
                   Mr. N. B. Patil, A.P.P. for State
                    __________________________________________________________


                                     CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                     DATE      : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026

                   PER COURT :

                   1)             Learned advocate Mr. Gaikwad holding for Mr.

                   Awasarmol,       learned   counsel     for    the      petitioner,        on

                   instructions, submits that subsequent to filing of the ‘B’

                   Summary, this matter has become infructuous.

                   2)             In view of the same, criminal writ petition

                   stands disposed of as infructuous.



                   (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)              (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                             JUDGE                              JUDGE




                   Komal Kamble                                                    Page| 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.