Bombay High Court

SHIVANI W/O PANKAJ UPAREversusAMBADAS BALAJI UPARE AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed of as its purpose has been subserved.

Summary

Shivani, the petitioner, filed a criminal writ petition against Ambadas Balaji Upare and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that after the order dated 07-10-2021, respondent No.5 had ceased harassing the petitioner. On this basis, the petition was deemed to have achieved its purpose. The Court held that there was no further ground to continue the petition. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the criminal writ petition should be dismissed as its purpose has been fulfilled

Subjects

criminal writ petition
disposal
harassment
purpose subserved

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42249-DB

                                                                             772.22WP

                                                 1

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        917 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.772 OF 2022

                                   SHIVANI W/O PANKAJ UPARE
                                               VERSUS
                               AMBADAS BALAJI UPARE & OTHERS
                                                   ...
                          Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.Hemant S. Surve
                             APP for Respondent-State : Mr.S.J.Salgare
                                                  …
                                        CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                       VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.

                                       DATE      :   10.09.2026
                 P.C. :


                 1]           The   learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner,    on

                 instructions, submits that after passing of the order dated

                 07.10.2021, now the respondent no. 5 is not harassing the

                 petitioner further.



                 2]           Under    such   circumstances,   purpose     of     this

                 petition is subserved and accordingly the same stands

                 disposed of.



                 [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]              [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
                         JUDGE                             JUDGE

                 DDC

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…