Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GRAM VIKAS MANDAL PIMPLAGAON THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN PRAKASH BAJIRAO PATIL AND ANOTHERversusSHIVANAND DATTATRAY MAHAJAN AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42829



                                                       1
                                                                      920-wp-7799-2024

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 7799 OF 2024

                         Gram Vikas Mandal Pimplagaon Through Its Chairman
                                    Prakash Bajirao Patil And Another
                                                 VERSUS
                                Shivanand Dattatray Mahajan And Others
                                                    ...
                     Ms. Khushbu Marwadi-Ozarkar, Advocate for the Petitioners
                     (Thr. V. C.)
                     Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for Respondent-State
                     Mr. S. M. Gunjkar h/f Mr. V. B. Garud, Advocate for
                     Respondent no.1
                                                   …..
                                          CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
                                            DATED : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2026

                     P.C. :-

                     .         Taking exception to the order dated 08.08.2023 passed

                     by learned Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Nashik In

                     Miscellaneous Application No.08 of 2023, the School/

                     management has filed the present Writ Petition. By the

                     impugned order, the School Tribunal allowed the application

                     filed by the employee/respondent seeking condonation of

                     delay caused in filing the appeal.

                     2.        Today, when the matter is taken up, Ms. Khushbu

                     Marwadi-Ozarkar learned Advocate for the petitioner marking

                     her       appearance    through       video   conferencing   and
                                2
                                                920-wp-7799-2024

Mr. S. M. Gunjkar h/f Mr. V. B. Garud, learned Advocate for

the respondent/employee submit that during pendency of the

petition, the main appeal filed by the respondent before the

Tribunal is disposed of on merits. In view of this, it is

submitted that nothing remains in the present petition.

3.      In view of the above, Writ Petition stands disposed of as

infructuous.



                                    ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )

Rushikesh/2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.