Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHARAT BHAGWAN SONAVANE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Bharat Bhagwan Sonavane and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and, after February 22, 2021, did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges on 29 August 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear and does not pursue a filed writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • failure to appear

Judgment

                 ssm                                                    51-wp786.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 786 OF 2021

            Bharat Bhagwan Sonavane & Ors.                              …..Petitioners

                     Vs.

            State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                                 …..Respondents

                                 ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioners.
            Shri. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
                               ____________________________________

                                              CORAM :        A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                             KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE :      29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)              None for Petitioners when called out for hearing.

            2)              Record indicates that, after 22nd February, 2021, neither the

            Petitioners nor their Advocates have taken any steps to circulate the

            Petition, even once.

            2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

            the Petition.

            3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                         1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:05 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.