Bombay High Court
BERTALINHA C. NOVOES THR. POA HELEN LOURENCOversusTHE STATE OF GOA THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS
- Disposal
- Infructuos
Holding
The court held that the prayers in the petition do not survive and therefore the writ petition is infructuous.
Summary
A writ petition (No. 786 of 2023) was filed by Helen Lourenco, represented by Advocate Vithal Naik, against the State of Goa and its officials. The petitioner sought relief, but the learned advocate later informed the court that the prayers in the petition no longer survived. The court examined whether the petition could continue in the absence of surviving prayers. It concluded that without surviving prayers, the petition was infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the prayers in the writ petition survive and the petition can proceed
Subjects
- Writ petition
- Infructuous
- Petition disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-GOA:1806
14 WP 786 2023
Jose
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.786 OF 2023
BERTALINHA C. NOVOES THR. POA
HELEN LOURENCO ... PETITIONER
Versus
THE STATE OF GOA THR. THE CHIEF
SECRETARY AND 3 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
Mr Vithal Naik, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM:- S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED :- 8th September, 2026
P.C.:
1. Learned Advocate appearing for Petitioner, on instructions,
states that prayers in the petition do not survive; hence, Writ
Petition is rendered infructuous.
2. In that view of the matter, Writ Petition stands disposed of.
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
Signed by: JOSE FRANCISCO
DSOUZA
Page 1 of 1
Designation: Personal Assistant
Date: 08/09/2026 16:50:42 8th September, 2026
Checking your session…