Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VISHNU @ TUKYA HARIDAS DAKE (C-8875)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had been acquitted, leaving no relief to grant.

Summary

Vishnu @ Tukya Haridas Dake filed a criminal writ petition seeking release on furlough. No counsel appeared for him. The court noted that his criminal appeal (No. 386 of 2022) had been allowed and he was acquitted on 27 February 2024. Since the conviction no longer existed, the petition had no operative relief to grant. Consequently, the court held the petition infructuous and disposed of it. The petition was therefore dismissed without any order on furlough.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition seeking furlough remains maintainable after the petitioner has been acquitted in a prior appeal

Subjects

  • criminal law
  • writ petition
  • acquittal
  • furlough
  • infructuous

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38974-DB

                                                       920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 797 OF 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 797 OF 2023

                              Vishnu @ Tukya Haridas Dake (C-8875)
                                              VERSUS
                                     The State Of Maharashtra
                   __________________________________________________________
                   Adv. Salunke Sudarshan J. (appointed) for the Petitioner -
                   Absent
                   Mr. S. J. Salgare, APP for State
                   __________________________________________________________

                                     CORAM      : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                  VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                     DATE       : AUGUST 20, 2026

                   PER COURT :

                   1)             None appears for the petitioner.

                   2)             The   petitioner   has   sought       his    release       on

                   furlough. However, as per the report of the Resource

                   Personnel of this Court dated 19.08.2026, the Criminal

                   Appeal No. 386 of 2022 filed by the petitioner against his

                   conviction was allowed by this Court on 27.02.2024 and

                   the petitioner was acquitted. In view of the same, nothing

                   survives in the present petition. Criminal Writ Petition,

                   therefore, stands disposed of as infructuous.



                   (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)             (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                             JUDGE                             JUDGE

                   Komal Kamble                                                   Page|1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.