Bombay High Court
SHAMINA RAUF PATELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court allowed the petitioner to give a supplementary statement to the police.
Summary
The petitioner, Shamina Rauf Patel, filed a complaint on 19 September 2025, leading to the registration of FIR No. 290 of 2026 under Sections 331(4), 305, 126(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 by the Taloja Police Station. The petitioner subsequently sought permission to furnish a supplementary statement to the police in connection with the FIR. The respondent State, through its Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the petition. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the petitioner liberty to give the supplementary statement. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to give a supplementary statement to the police after the FIR has been registered.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 126(2), 305, 331(4), 3(5)
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure
- Supplementary Statement
- FIR
- Writ Petition
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Judgment
sns 14-wp-798-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.798 OF 2026
Shamina Rauf Patel … Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Prakash N. Wagh a/w. Adv. Archana P. Wagh for the Petitioner.
Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. U. J. Gutal, PSI, Taloja Police Station, present.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 7th September, 2026
P.C.:-
1) Learned APP on instructions from Mr. Gutal submitted that, in
furtherance of the complaint made by the Petitioner dated 19 th September
2025, C.R. bearing No.290 of 2026 under Sections 331(4), 305, 126(2)
and3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, has been registered by Taloja
Police Station, Navi Mumbai.
2) Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that, the
Petitioner intends to give his supplementary statement to the Police.
3) In view thereof, by reserving the liberty in favour of the
Petitioner to give his supplementary statement in the said crime, Petition is
disposed off.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…