Bombay High Court
MARATHWADA UNDER PRIVILEGED TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, AURANGABADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed as the matter is covered by the Full Bench judgment.
Summary
The Marathwada Under Privileged Teachers Association filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was argued by Mr. U. R. Awate, while the State was represented by Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya and Mr. V. A. Bagdiya. The Court observed that the issues raised were already decided by a Full Bench judgment in Dilipkumar Bhagwan Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra (2019). Accordingly, the Court disposed of the present petition without further hearing. The Court, however, kept the petition open for re‑filing if the Full Bench decision is later reversed or modified on appeal.
Issues considered
- Whether the relief sought in the writ petition is maintainable in view of the Full Bench judgment in Dilipkumar Bhagwan Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra
Subjects
- writ petition
- full bench judgment
- state of Maharashtra
- teachers association
- jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39944-DB
1 902-wp 7985-2015.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7985 OF 2015
Marathwada Under Privileged Teachers
Association Through its Secretary
Shri Vilas Kisanrao Pande .. Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Respondents
Mr. U. R. Awate, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6.
Mr. V. A. Bagdiya, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 13 & 14.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 01st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
PER COURT :-
1. Heard.
2. It is informed that the issue involved in the present petition
is covered by the Full Bench judgment passed by this Court at
Principal Seat at Bombay in the case of Dilipkumar Bhagwan
Deshmukh And Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors., 2019
(3) Mh.L.J. 903.
3. In view of the above position, present writ petition stands
2 902-wp 7985-2015.odt
disposed of.
4. It is kept open for the petitioner to approach this Court
again, in case, in S.L.P. the said judgment of the Full Bench is
reversed /modified.
( JITENDRA JAIN, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )
P.S.B.
Checking your session…