Bombay High Court
SHRI. SUNIL GOKUL RANE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
A writ petition that remains unprosecuted may be dismissed, and an interim application that does not survive procedural scrutiny is disposed.
Summary
Petitioners Sunil Gokul Rane and Sunil Amruta Bobade filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners' counsel, Laxman Deshmukh, filed a vakalatnama and indicated no objection to Advocate Rajaram Deshmukh. The Court noted that the petition had been listed for dismissal and that Advocate Rajaram Deshmukh was aware of its pendency. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the petitions for non‑prosecution. The interim application filed in WP No. 6470/2021 was also held not to survive for consideration and was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution under procedural law
- Whether the interim application filed in WP No. 6470/2021 should be entertained
Subjects
- dismissal
- non‑prosecution
- writ petition
- interim application
- procedural law
Judgment
2026:BHC-KOL:9628-DB
3-WP-7995-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7995 OF 2021
Shri. Sunil Gokul Rane ...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 6470 OF 2021
Shri. Sunil Amruta Bobade ...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11214 OF 2024
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6470 OF 2021
Shri. Sunil Amruta Bobade ...Applicant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...Respondents
——————
Mr. Laxman Deshmukh, for the Petitioners.
Mr. S.B.Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP No. 7995/2021.
Mr. V.M.Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP No. 6470/2021.
——————
Coram : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
Date : OCTOBER 06, 2026
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has already
Arya Chavan 1 of 2
3-WP-7995-2021.doc
given his no objection to the Petitioner and Advocate Rajaram
Deshmukh has filed his vakalatnama.
2. The Petition is listed under the caption for dismissal. The order
indicates that Advocate Rajaram Deshmukh had appeared on the last
occasion, and is therefore aware of the pendency of the Petition.
3. The Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Interim Application does not survive for consideration and stands
disposed of.
[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
Arya Chavan 2 of 2
Checking your session…