Bombay High Court
PRAMOD VASANT KULKARNIversusCOLLECTORATE OF AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Pramod Vasant Kulkarni, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner's counsel was absent on the scheduled hearing date of 10 August 2026. The matter was subsequently posted for dismissal due to the absence. No further representation was made by the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's counsel's absence
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- counsel absence
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37192
1 54-WP-8005-13.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8005 OF 2013
PRAMOD VASANT KULKARNI
VERSUS
COLLECTORATE OF AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
...
AGP for Respondents : Mr. P. P. Dawalkar
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 17-08-2026
PER COURT:-
1. Recording absence of the counsel for the petitioner on
10.08.2026, the matter was posted for dismissal. Even today,
nobody is present for the petitioner. As such, the writ petition
stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
JUDGE
rrd
Checking your session…