Bombay High Court
SANGHARSH BHIMRAO LANJEWARversusMINAL SANGHARSHA LANJEWAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The Court granted leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file the appropriate application before the Family Court.
Summary
Vaishali Anil Tikam filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition and to obtain liberty to file an application for setting aside an evidence-closed order passed by the Family Court. The petitioner, represented by Mr. V.G. Bhamburkar and Mr. Surbh Agrawal, argued that the petition was no longer necessary and that a separate application would be more appropriate. The respondent, Minal Sangharsha Lanjewar, was represented by Mr. Himanshu Mendhe. The Court considered the submissions and determined that the petitioner could be allowed to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the Court granted leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file the appropriate application before the Family Court. The writ petition was thereafter dismissed and disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the writ petition and be granted liberty to file a separate application to set aside the evidence-closed order of the Family Court
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- family court
- evidence closed order
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- writ petition
Judgment
903- WP 8013 of 2026.doc
Tikam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8013 OF 2026
VAISHALI
ANIL Sangharsh Ghimrao Lanjewar ...Petitioner
TIKAM Vs.
Minal Sangharsha Lanjewar ...Respondent
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM
Date:
2026.10.06
12:26:00 +0530
_________________________________________________________________
Mr. V.G. Bhamburkar a/w. Surbh Agrawal, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Himanshu Mendhe, Advocate for the Respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 1st OCTOBER 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this
petition with liberty to file appropriate application for setting aside the
evidence closed order before the Family Court.
3. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the
Petitioner, leave granted to withdraw the petition with aforesaid liberty.
4. Petition is dismissed and disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.