Bombay High Court

ANSARI AKILA MOHAMMAD YASEENversusANANA W/O MOHAMMAD YASEEN AND ANR

Decided: 24 August 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition but failed to appear or prosecute the matter. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, indicating loss of interest. The respondent State was represented by Adv. A.I. Patel and Savita A. Prabhune. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. No substantive merits were addressed.

Issues considered

Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

writ petition
dismissal
want of prosecution
civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                                         20 WP 8029-23.DOC



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                     WRIT PETITION NO. 8029 OF 2023


Ansari Akila Mohammad Yaseen                                      Petitioner
      Versus
Anana w/o Mohammad Yaseen and another                             Respondents

                                        _______
None for the petitioner.
Adv. A.I. Patel, Additional GP a/w Savita A. Prabhune AGP appearing for the
respondent-State.
                                        _______

                              CORAM:          AARTI SATHE, J.

                                DATE:         24 AUGUST 2026

P.C.

         None appears for the Petitioner. It seems that the Petitioner has lost interest

in prosecuting the present petition. Dismissed for want of prosecution.




                                              (AARTI SATHE, J.)




                                     Page 1 of 1
Tiwari

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…