Bombay High Court
JAMNABAI GANGARAM GITEversusNAMDEO KESHAV MUNDHE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
A writ petition becomes infructuous and must be dismissed when the substantive civil suit it challenges has been finally disposed.
Summary
The petitioner, Jamnabai Gangaram Gite, filed a writ petition challenging Order Exhibit‑41 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Hingoli. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the underlying Regular Civil Suit No. 182/2012 had been fully disposed of by the trial court on 14 June 2023. The High Court examined whether the writ petition could continue in view of the final disposal of the civil suit. It held that with the substantive suit concluded, there was no remaining cause of action for the writ petition. Consequently, the petition was deemed infructuous and was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition challenging an order remains maintainable after the underlying civil suit has been finally disposed
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil suit disposal
- jurisdiction
- petition dismissed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38274
8044.2020WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
5 WRIT PETITION NO. 8044 OF 2020
JAMNABAI GANGARAM GITE
VERSUS
NAMDEO KESHAV MUNDHE AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner:Adv. V.A. Babras h/f Mr. Gangakhedkar S.S.
Advocate for Respondent nos.1 and 2 : Mr. Aarti T. Gadge h/f
Mr.D.M. Shinde
...
CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.
DATE : 24.08.2026
P.C. :
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has
challenged the order below Exhibit-41 passed by the learned
2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Hingoli.
2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that
Regular Civil Suit No.182/2012 is disposed of by the trial
Court on 14.06.2023.
3. In view of the same, nothing survives in this
petition and the same stands disposed of as infructuous.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
JUDGE
SGA
Checking your session…