Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH ARIF AHMED PARE MOHDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to seek an alternate remedy.

Summary

The petitioner, Shaikh Arif Ahmed Pare Mohd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to pursue an alternate remedy. The petitioner’s counsel moved the court for such permission. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and other parties, were represented by their respective advocates. The Court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal with liberty for an alternative remedy. Finding no impediment, the Court granted the petitioner's request. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty sought.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail an alternate remedy?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • alternate remedy
  • high court
  • procedural law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38358-DB


                                               1                   5-WP-8142-26.odt


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              WRIT PETITION NO. 8142 OF 2026

                                 SHAIKH ARIF AHMED PARE MOHD.
                                             VERSUS
                  THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND
                                             OTHERS
                                                ...
              Mr. Chandrakant V. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for Respondents/State
              Mr. N. S. Muthiyan, Advocate for Respondent No.6
              Mr. N. E. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.2
              Ms. Priyanka D. Maske, Advocate h/f Talekar And Associates For
              Respondent No.5
                                                ...

                                      CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                              ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                       DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026

              PER COURT :

              1.           Learned advocate for petitioner, on instructions, seeks

              permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail

              alternate remedy.

              2.           Permission is granted. Writ petition is disposed of as

              withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.



              (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              SVH


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.