Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AMOL ASHOK HOLKUNDEversusYOGITA AMOL HOLKUNDE

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Amol Ashok Holkunde filed a writ petition (No. 8152 of 2023) in the Bombay High Court against Yogita Amol Holkunde. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the same occurred on the previous hearing. The Court noted the petitioner’s absence and, after giving an opportunity to appear, dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. No substantive issues were argued or decided. The order was pronounced by Justice Shivkumar Dige on 31 August 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should proceed despite the petitioner’s failure to appear before the Court

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • non‑prosecution
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                           76-WP-8152-2023 (C).doc


      Shubhada S Kadam


                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 8152 OF 2023

                      Amol Ashok Holkunde                                     ...Petitioner/s
                      Versus
                      Yogita Amol Holkunde                                    ...Respondent/s

                      _________________________________________________________________

                      None for Petitioner.
                      Ms. Panthi Desai i/b. M. P. Vashi and Associates, Advocate for Respondent.
                      _________________________________________________________________

                                                         CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                         DATE         :   31st AUGUST, 2026.
                      P.C. :

                      1.         None present for the petitioner. On last date also, none was

                      present for the petitioner.

                      2.         Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




SHUBHADA
SHANKAR
KADAM
Digitally signed by
SHUBHADA
SHANKAR KADAM
Date: 2026.09.01
11:13:48 +0530                                        Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.