Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VICKY KRIPALANIversusBHAWANA THADHANEY

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The High Court may direct the Family Court to decide a pending relocation application on its merits expeditiously.

Summary

The petitioner, Vicky Kripalani, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Family Court to decide his pending application for relocation of his children to the United Kingdom. The respondent, Bhawana Dilip Thadhaney, opposed the direction and asked that the Family Court decide the matter on its own merits. The High Court, after hearing counsel, found no impediment to granting the direction. It allowed the petition and ordered the Family Court to decide the relocation application on its merits as expeditiously as possible. No substantive discussion of merits was provided, as the order was limited to procedural direction.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct the Family Court to decide a pending application for relocation of children to a foreign country on its merits

Subjects

  • relocation of children
  • family law
  • jurisdiction
  • writ petition
  • child custody
  • international relocation

Judgment

                                                                      5-WP-8164-2026 (C).doc


Shubhada S Kadam


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 8164 OF 2026

               Vicky Kripalani                                          ...Petitioner/s
               Versus
               Bhawana Dilip Thadhaney                                  ...Respondent/s
               _________________________________________________________________

               Mr. Abhijeet Sarwate along with Mr. Vinayak Pandit and Ms.Teena Kapoor
               i/b. Mr. Ajinkya Udane, Advocate for Petitioner.

               Ms. Bhawana Thadhaney, Respondent in person present.
               _________________________________________________________________

                                                    CORAM       :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                    DATE        :   7th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
               P.C. :



               1.         By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the

               Family Court to decide the application filed by him for relocation of

               children to the United Kingdom.

               2.         Respondent party-in-person, submits that direction be given to

               decide the said application on its own merits.

               3.         I have heard both learned counsel. The petitioner's application

               for relocation of children to the United Kingdom, which is pending before

               the Family Court was filed on 4th October 2024.




                                                 Page 1 of 2
                                                                    5-WP-8164-2026 (C).doc


Shubhada S Kadam


               4.        In view of the above, I pass following order:

                                              ORDER

                    1.   The petition is allowed.

                    2.   Learned Judge, Family Court,         is directed to decide the

                         petitioner's application for relocation of children to the United

                         Kingdom, on its own merits as expeditiously as possible.




                                                            (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                              Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.