Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GEETA AJAY GROVERversusVIJAYKUMAR VASANTRAO HATE

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite notice.

Summary

A writ petition was filed by Geeta Ajay Grover in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates, prompting the court to issue a notice. As the petitioner was not found on the premises, the notice was served by affixing. Despite the service of notice, the petitioner continued to be absent. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear after notice

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-appearance
  • dismissal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • procedural default

Judgment

                                                                              20-WP-8220-2017.docx


               rrpillai            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                           WRIT PETITION NO. 8220 OF 2017


                              Geeta Ajay Grover                         …     Petitioner
                                   Vs.
                              Vijaykumar Vasantrao Hate                 …     Respondent


                              None for the Petitioner.
                              Mr. Chandrakant Chavan for Respondent No.1.


                                                      CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

                                                      DATE :       21st AUGUST 2026

                              ORDER :


                              1.    Since none had appeared for the petitioner on various

                              dates this court had issued notice to the petitioner.


                              2.    Office remark shows that since none was found on the

                              premises, the notice is served by affixing.


                              3.    Even today none appears for the petitioner.


                              4.    The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                                                         [GAURI GODSE, J.]
           Digitally signed
           by
           RAJESHWARI
RAJESHWARI RAMESH
RAMESH     PILLAI
PILLAI     Date:
           2026.08.21
           14:55:32 +0530
                                                             1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.