Bombay High Court

DR BABASAHEB GANGARAM UNAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petitions are allowed; the State must refund the recovered amounts and pay all consequential retiral benefits to the petitioners.

Summary

Several writ petitions filed by individual petitioners against the State of Maharashtra challenged the recovery of amounts and denial of retiral benefits by the State. The petitioners alleged that the impugned orders were illegal and that they were entitled to a refund of the recovered sums along with all consequential retiral benefits. The Court examined the earlier decisions of its coordinate bench in Writ Petition No. 1150 of 2026 and its own bench in Writ Petition No. 6442 of 2026, finding that the same principles applied. It held that the recoveries were not justified and that the petitioners were entitled to restitution. Consequently, the Court allowed all the writ petitions, directing the State to refund the amounts within 90 days and to pay the petitioners their full retiral benefits.

Issues considered

The legality of the State's recovery of amounts from the petitioners
Whether the petitioners are entitled to consequential retiral benefits

Subjects

refund
retiral benefits
writ petition
state recovery
administrative law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37802-DB
                                         1                        4,5,99,102,104,224.doc



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                        4 WRIT PETITION NO. 9576 OF 2026

                        SHAIKH MAZHAR SHAHAMIR
                                VERSUS
          STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                             ...


                Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Ansari Asfia Nuzhat
                     AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. N.S. Tekale
               Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : Mr. Parth S. Salunke
                                          …
                       5 WRIT PETITION NO. 9582 OF 2026

                      RANJANA BHAUSAHEB BANSODE
                                VERSUS
          STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                             …
                 Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Ansari Asfia Nuzhat
                   AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. Neha B. Kamble
               Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : Mr. Parth S. Salunke
                                           …
                      99 WRIT PETITION NO. 10089 OF 2025

                          JIJABAI RAOSAHEB THOMBRE
                                    VERSUS
                    THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                             ...


                 Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Ansari Asfia Nuzhat
                      AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.S.R. Wakale
      Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 : Mr. Vishal H. Rathod h/f. S.P. Urgunde
                                           …
                      102 WRIT PETITION NO. 15160 OF 2025

                      ANSARI PARVEEN BANU MOHD. YOUSUF
                                   VERSUS
                    THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                             …
                 Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Ansari Asfia Nuzhat
                                     2                         4,5,99,102,104,224.doc



                 AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.S.K. Tambe
Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 : Mr. Vishal H. Rathod h/f. S.P. Urgunde
                                   …
                 104 WRIT PETITION NO. 1019 OF 2026

                ATMARAM JANARDHAN KHEDKAR
                          VERSUS
    STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETORY AND OTHERS
                                         ...
             Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Ansari Asfia Nuzhat
                   AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.V.M. Kagne
           Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 : Mr. Parth S. Salunke
                                       …
                   224 WRIT PETITION NO. 8264 OF 2026

             DR BABASAHEB GANGARAM UNAWANE
                         VERSUS
 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                         …
             Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Ansari Asfia Nuzhat
                   AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.V.M. Kagne
           Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 : Mr. Parth S. Salunke
                                       …


                                     CORAM      : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                  ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                         DATE   : 18.08.2026

       PER COURT :
       .        The case of the Petitioners is squarely covered by the decision of
       the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 1150 of 2026
       and by this Bench in Writ Petition No. 6442 of 2026.


       2.      For the reasons stated in the said orders, the Writ Petitions are
       allowed. The amount recovered from the Petitioners pursuant to the
       impugned orders is directed to be refunded to them within 90 days and
                          3                       4,5,99,102,104,224.doc



the Petitioners shall be paid all the consequential retiral benefits
thereof.



( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. )           ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )



vsj..

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…