Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANIL MARUTI KAMBLE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition for petitioner Nos.2 and 5 and disposed of the petition, granting liberty to approach the Divisional Commissioner.

Summary

Petitioners sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ petition for petitioner Nos.2 and 5, submitting written instructions. The Court granted the request, disposing of the petition to the extent of those petitioners. It further directed that any grievance may be raised before the Divisional Commissioner under clause 10 of the Government Resolution dated 18/05/2011. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed with liberty to approach the administrative authority. No substantive merits of the original writ were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may permit withdrawal of a writ petition by the petitioners.
  • Whether the petitioners have an alternative administrative remedy under the Government Resolution.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • administrative remedy
  • Divisional Commissioner
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40146-DB


                                               1                   908-WP-8488-26.odt


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                WRIT PETITION NO. 8488 OF 2026

                                ANIL MARUTI KAMBLE AND OTHERS
                                             VERSUS
                           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                               ...
              Mr. Ramrao D. Biradar, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Ms. S. S. Joshi, AGP for Respondents/State
              Mr. Uttam B. Bondar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 And 6
                                               …
                                      CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                              ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                       DATE : 02nd SEPTEMBER, 2026

              PER COURT :

              1.           At the outset, learned advocate for petitioners, on

              written instructions from petitioner Nos.2 and 5, seeks permission to

              withdraw the writ petition to the extent of petitioner Nos.2 and 5.

              Copy of the written instructions is marked as ‘X’ for the purpose of

              identification.

              2.           Permission is granted. Writ petition is disposed of as

              withdrawn to the extent of petitioner Nos.2 and 5.

              3.           Grievance of the petitioners can be raised before the

              Divisional Commissioner in terms of clause 10 of the Government

              Resolution dated 18/05/2011. The writ petition is, therefore,

              disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the

              Divisional Commissioner.



              (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)             (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)


              SVH


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.