Bombay High Court
RITU RAVI JAINversusRAVI JAIN
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed To be withdrawn
Holding
The petition was withdrawn, and the trial court was directed to decide the matter on its merits with the parties' contentions kept open.
Summary
Ritu Ravi Jain filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Anil Tikam Ravi Jain. The petitioner, represented by Ms. Taubon F. Irani assisted by Divya Sharma, sought relief but later decided to withdraw the petition. The court, presided over by Justice Shivkumar Dige, recorded the withdrawal on 28 September 2026. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the substantive contentions raised in an amendment application remain open for consideration. Accordingly, the court directed that both parties' contentions be kept open and that the trial court decide the matter on its own merits.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- trial court
- procedural direction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
906- WP 8555 of 2026.doc
Tikam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8555 OF 2026
Ritu Ravi Jain ...Petitioner
VAISHALI Vs.
ANIL
TIKAM Ravi Jain ...Respondent
_________________________________________________________________
Digitally signed
by VAISHALI
ANIL TIKAM Ms. Taubon F. Irani a/w Divya Sharma, Advocate for Petitioner.
Date:
2026.10.08 Ms. Kavita Vijay Samant, Advocate for Respondent.
18:12:54 +0530
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. This Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn by order dated
28/09/2026.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner placed this matter for certain
directions.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that contentions of
the Petitioner be kept open as contentions raised in the amendment
application.
4. Contentions of both the parties are kept open and the Trial
Court shall decide the matter on its own merits.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.