Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JAYWANT LAXMAN RAKSHEversusSR. POLICE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ATTACHED TO HINJEWADI POLICE STATION PUNE AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Jaywant Laxman Rakshe, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and, after August 13, 2021, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief. Consequently, the judges dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and take steps to pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                    53-wp857.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 857 OF 2021

            Jaywant Laxman Rakshe                                …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            Sr. Police Inspector Of Police & Ors.                …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Smt. P.P. Shinde APP, for the Respondent-State.
                              ____________________________________

                                              CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE :      29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, after 13th August, 2021, neither the

            Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

            even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                         (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                         1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:05 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.