Bombay High Court
GOPAL GORAKH CHOUDHARI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The order dated 28‑09‑2026 is corrected to record Ms. Sneha Pravin Patil as the advocate for respondent No. 4 and a fresh order shall be uploaded.
Summary
In a writ petition filed by Gopal Gorakh Choudhari and others against the State of Maharashtra, the High Court noted that the order dated 28 September 2026 omitted the name of the advocate representing respondent No. 4. The petitioners sought correction of the record. The Court examined the appearance list and found the omission to be a clerical error. It directed that the appearance of respondent No. 4 be recorded as Ms. Sneha Pravin Patil and that a fresh corrected order be uploaded. No substantive legal issues were raised, and the order was merely amended for accuracy.
Issues considered
- Whether the order dated 28‑09‑2026 requires correction to record the correct advocate for respondent No. 4
Subjects
- court procedure
- record correction
- writ petition
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:44626-DB
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8578 OF 2018
GOPAL GORAKH CHOUDHARI AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for petitioners : Mr. D.S. Bagul
AGP for the respondent – State : Mr. N.S. Tekale
...
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 05 OCTOBER 2026
PER COURT :
Not on Board. Taken on Board.
2. Name of Advocate who appeared for respondent no. 4,
does not find place in the appearance in the order dated 28.09.2026.
3. The aforesaid order dated 28.09.2026, be corrected.
4. The appearance of respondent no. 4 be recorded as Ms.
Sneha Pravin Patil. Fresh order be uploaded.
[ JITENDRA JAIN ] [ KISHORE C. SANT ]
JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
Checking your session…