Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PHILIP JOSEPH AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 17 February 2021 but failed to appear for any hearing. The court noted that the petitioners and their counsel made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. It was observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal reflects the procedural requirement that parties must actively pursue their petitions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioners' non-appearance and inaction

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • procedural default

Judgment

                 ssm                                                       54-wp858.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 858 OF 2021

            Philip Joseph & Ors.                                          .…..Petitioners

                     Vs.

            State Of Maharashtra & Anr.                                   …..Respondents

                                 ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioners.
            Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre APP, for the Respondent-State.
                              ____________________________________

                                                CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                             KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                  DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)              None for Petitioners when called out for hearing.

            2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            17th February, 2021, neither the Petitioners nor their Advocates have taken

            any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

            the Petition.

            3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                           (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                            1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:03 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.