Bombay High Court

SURESH MOHANLAL BHANDARI, LRS LATA AND OTHERSversusAHMEDNAGAR SHAHAR CO OP BANK LTD, AHMEDNAGAR AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that, due to the parties’ amicable settlement, the writ petitions were rendered infructuous and were therefore disposed of.

Summary

The petitioners, Suresh Mohanlal Bhandari, LRS Lata and others, filed writ petitions (Nos. 8581, 8582 and 8602 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of Ahmednagar Shahar Co‑Op Bank Ltd and another respondent. The petition sought relief on unspecified grounds. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement that resolved the dispute. The petitioners, through their counsel, informed the court that nothing remained to be adjudicated. The court, noting the settlement, held that the writ petitions were rendered infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed of the petitions as infructuous.

Subjects

writ petition
settlement
infructuous
civil procedure
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:35146
                                                   1                    29-WP-8581-15.odt




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 8581 OF 2015
                                WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8582 OF 2015
                                WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8602 OF 2015

                         SURESH MOHANLAL BHANDARI, LRS LATA AND OTHERS
                                                VERSUS
                      AHMEDNAGAR SHAHAR CO OP BANK LTD, AHMEDNAGAR AND
                                               ANOTHER
                                                    ...
                          Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Atharva M. Pathak h/f.
                                                     Mr. Aniruddha S. Pathak
                       Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sanjuay N. Gaikwad h/f.
                                                        Mr. Niteen V. Gaware
                           Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Ajit M. Gholap
                                                    ...

                                            CORAM :        SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                            DATE       :   11-08-2026
                PER COURT:-

                1.      The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions,

                submits in view of amicable settlement arrived at between the

                litigating sides, nothing survives in the petitions and the same are

                rendered infructuous. As such, the writ petitions are disposed of

                as infructuous.



                                                   [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
                                                           JUDGE

                rrd

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…