Bombay High Court
RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
Since the debt was fully repaid, the court held that no further orders for possession were necessary and disposed of the petition.
Summary
The petitioner, Religare Finvest Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking court-ordered physical possession of a secured asset on 10 August 2026. The court had earlier directed possession in its order dated 27 July 2026. On the scheduled date, the respondent borrowers partially, then fully, repaid the amount due to the petitioner, rendering possession unnecessary. The petitioner’s counsel indicated that only minor formalities remained to close the loan account. Considering the full repayment, the court found no further relief was required and disposed of the petition, also dismissing any pending applications.
Issues considered
- What relief, if any, should the court grant when the secured borrower has fully repaid the debt after a possession order was issued?
Subjects
- secured loan
- possession
- repayment
- writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- loan closure
Judgment
21-WP-8604-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8604 OF 2026
Religare Finvest Limited … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents
******
Mr. Charles D’souza, a/w Mr. Archit Virmani and Mr. Atul Gupta, a/w Ms.
Pragati Goti, for Petitioner.
Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl GP, a/w Ms. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for
SWEETY
RAJU
BHALERAO Respondent/State.
Digitally signed
by SWEETY RAJU
BHALERAO
Date: 2026.08.18
******
11:03:30 +0530
CORAM : MANISH PITALE &
SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
DATE : 17th AUGUST 2026.
PC:
1. This petition is listed for compliance in the light of the order dated
27/07/2026. By the said order, physical possession of the subject property
was to be taken on 10/08/2026.
2. This Court is informed that on the said date when the physical
possession was to be taken, the respondent borrowers partly paid the
amount due and thereafter they paid the entire amount due to the
petitioner (secured creditor). In that light, there was no necessity to take
steps as directed by this Court for taking physical possession of the
secured asset on 10/08/2026.
Bhalerao 1
21-WP-8604-2026.doc
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner informs this Court that only few
formalities are left for completing the said exercise of closing the loan
account itself.
4. In view of the above, no further orders are necessary in this petition
and accordingly it is disposed of.
5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)
Bhalerao 2
Checking your session…