Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VINAYAK JAISING VASAVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is allowed, directing the Education Officer to verify eligibility and, where appropriate, grant the one‑step pay scale benefits and arrears to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking entitlement to the one‑step pay scale and related salary arrears applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The High Court noted that the issues were already decided in earlier bench orders (Writ Petition No. 248 of 2026 and Writ Petition No. 13241 of 2024) and therefore allowed the petition. It directed the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad Dhule, to examine the petitioner’s service record within 30 days and, if no legal impediment is found, to grant the one‑step pay scale benefits and arrears. If the petitioner is found ineligible, a notice must be issued for a hearing, after which a final order will be passed within 120 days. The petitioner retains the right to seek statutory remedy against any adverse order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is eligible for the one‑step pay scale benefits under the 29‑02‑2024 Government Resolution for employees in Tribal and PESA areas.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to salary arrears and current salary adjustments in accordance with the one‑step pay scale.
  • What procedural steps the Education Officer must follow to verify eligibility and issue the benefits.
  • What statutory remedies are available to the petitioner if an adverse order is made.

Subjects

  • one step pay scale
  • Tribal areas
  • PESA
  • salary arrears
  • government resolution
  • writ petition
  • public service employment
  • statutory remedy

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39667-DB


                                                 {1}                     17-wp-8626-2026

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 17 WRIT PETITION NO. 8626 OF 2026

                                     Vinayak Jaising Vasave
                                            VERSUS
                              The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                               ...
              Mr. Om Pagar h/f Ms. Megha Mali, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Ms. Neha Kamble, AGP for State
                                             .......

                                       CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                 ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                          DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.      Admittedly, the issue raised in this Petition is squarely covered by

              the decisions rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Writ

              Petition No. 248 of 2026 and connected matters, dated 20th April,

              2026 and dated 4th December, 2024 in Writ Petition No. 13241 of

              2024.

              2.      For the reasons stated in the said orders, the Writ Petition stands

              allowed in the following terms:

               I.   Respondent No. 7/ Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad
                    Dhule, shall scrutinize the record of the Petitioner and the place
                    at which he is deployed for performing his duties, within a period
                    of 30 days from today, considering the Government Resolution
                    dated 29.02.2024.
                                    {2}                      17-wp-8626-2026

   II. The case which has no legal impediment after verification, shall
         be cleared by the concerned Respondents and the salary benefits
         to which the Petitioner is entitled to, in the light of the one step
         pay scale made available to the employees working in the Tribal
         and PESA areas, shall be paid to him along with arrears as well
         as his current salary, within a period of 30 days, thereafter.

   III. After scrutiny, if the Petitioner, on the basis of his record, is
         found to be ineligible, the concerned Respondent would issue
         notice to the Petitioner, so as to enable him to appear before the
         said authority and address it.

   IV. After such hearing, which shall be completed within 120 days,
         the concerned Respondent shall pass an appropriate order and
         grant benefits of one step pay scale to the candidate, who is
         found to be eligible.

   V. The Petitioner, who may suffer an adverse order after the above
         stated exercise is completed, shall be at liberty to avail of a
         statutory remedy, as is permissible in law and in the light of the
         Government Resolution dated 29.02.2024 issued by the General
         Administration Department.




(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                  (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




Bhagyawant Punde


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.