Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRI. BORKAR RAMDAS MADANE AND ORSversusVIKASHAK MUNDRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition and the pending civil application are dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a 2011 order that dismissed their appeal under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (IC& R) Act, 1971 and directed eviction. The High Court gave the petitioners multiple opportunities to show the present status of the premises and to seek interim relief, but no interim relief was granted in the pending civil application. After repeated adjournments, the petitioners failed to appear on the scheduled hearing dates, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The Court consequently dismissed the writ petition and the related civil application for non‑prosecution, vacating any interim relief that might have existed. The order was signed digitally and directed to be acted upon.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioners fail to appear despite multiple adjournments
  • Whether interim relief granted earlier stands when the petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • non‑prosecution
  • eviction
  • Maharashtra Slum Areas Act
  • civil application
  • interim relief

Judgment

                                                                                       4-WP-8932-2011.doc




                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

           Digitally
           signed by
                                               WRIT PETITION NO.8932 OF 2011
           HUSENBASHA
HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN
           NADAF
                                                            WITH
RAHAMAN
NADAF      Date:
           2026.09.08
                                             CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2241 OF 2012
           20:21:47
           +0530                                             IN
                                               WRIT PETITION NO.8932 OF 2011

                        Shri Borkar Ramdas Madane and Ors.           … Petitioners /Applicants
                               Versus
                        Vikashak Mundra and Ors.                     … Respondents

                                                           ***
                        None for the Petitioners.
                        Dr. Dhruti Kapadia for the Respondent/State.
                                                           ***

                                                                    CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.
                                                                    DATE    : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2026
                        P.C. :

                        1.       On 17.08.2026, following order was passed:


                                 “1.    The petition is filed challenging order dated 20.10.2011
                                 passed by Administrator and Divisional Commissioner                 Division
                                 Konkan Division, Mumbai, dismissing appeal filed by the Petitioners
                                 under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas ( IC& R) Act, 1971
                                 ('the Said Act' for short). It was directed that after giving notice of 7
                                 days, the action under eviction order dated 21.07.2011 be taken
                                 subject to decision of the High Power Committee.

                                 2.     Record indicates that while admitting the petition on
                                 22.11.2011,    it   is   already   recorded    that     the    notices     of
                                 eviction/demolition are implemented; however, the proceedings
                                 before High Power Committee was pending. Therefore, for the
                                 purpose of interim relief, liberty was given to the Petitioners to file
                                 separate civil application.

                        Husen                                        1
                                                           4-WP-8932-2011.doc




        3.    Perusal of the only pending civil application indicates that no
        interim relief is granted therein. The order of eviction/ demolition
        under Section 33/38 of the said Act is of July 2011.

        4.    In view of long lapse of time during pendency of the petition,
        it is necessary for the petitioners to first point out what is the
        present stage of premises in question and whether anything
        survives. For the said purpose, stand over to 24.08.2026 as an
        opportunity to the Petitioners.

        5.    To be listed 'for dismissal.'”


2.      On 01.09.2026, following order was passed:

        “1.   Under order dated 17.08.2026, the matter was directed to be
        listed for dismissal on 24.08.2026. However, on 24.08.2026, since
        this Court was not available (due to Division Bench work), the
        matter is adjourned for today.

        2.    In that view of the matter, to give one more opportunity to the
        Petitioner, stand over to 08.09.2026. To be listed 'for dismissal'.

3.      Today, the matter is listed for dismissal. However, nobody is
appearing for the Petitioners. It appears that the Petitioners are not
interested to proceed with the petition. Writ petition along with pending
civil application are therefore dismissed for non prosecution. Interim/ad-
interim relief, if any, stands vacated.

4.      All concerned to act on duly authenticated or digitally signed QR
verifiable copy of this order.

                                                   (M.M. SATHAYE, J.)




Husen                                      2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.