Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

UDAY GANPATRAO BADADAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Uday Ganpatrao Badadare, filed a writ petition on 29 October 2020 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges of the bench.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                      59-wp901.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 901 OF 2021

            Uday Ganpatrao Badadare                                      …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                   …..Respondents
                            ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Smt. P.P. Shinde APP, for the Respondent-State.
                              ____________________________________

                                               CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            29th October, 2020, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

            steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                           1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:06 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.