Bombay High Court
PRAJAKTA MAKARAND PATIL AND ANRversusENCORE ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition and disposed of it as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioners Prajakta Makarand Patil and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Alok D. Mishra, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. Any pending applications, if any, were also ordered to stand disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition pending before the High Court can be withdrawn by the petitioners upon permission of the Court
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- High Court of Bombay
- Civil appellate jurisdiction
- petition disposed
Judgment
12_WP9010_26.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9010 OF 2026
Prajakta Makarand Patil and another … Petitioners
Vs.
Encore Asset Reconstruction Company and another … Respondents
Mr. Alok D. Mishra for Petitioners.
Ms. Richa Shukla i/b. Mr. Archit Virmani for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE &
SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2026
P.C. :
. Mr. Mishra,learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions,
seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.
2. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
3. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)
Minal Parab
MINAL Digitally
by MINAL
signed
SANDIP SANDIP PARAB
Date: 2026.10.05
PARAB 17:36:59 +0530
1/1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.