Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MR. RAJU SANJAY INGVALEversusTHE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR.

Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The petition is dismissed for default due to the petitioner’s failure to appear.

Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Raju Sanjay Ingvale, filed a writ petition on 27 July 2017 seeking a direction to the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to decide a representation he had submitted on 21 July 2017. The petition was filed against the Government of India and another respondent. The petitioner failed to appear at any of the hearings after the filing of the petition. On 3 August 2026, the court noted the petitioner’s non‑appearance and placed the petition under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for default. No substantive merits of the representation were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court should direct NHAI to decide the representation filed by the petitioner

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • default dismissal
  • National Highways Authority of India
  • representation
  • Civil Procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:7641-DB
                                                                             4.WP.9072.2017.odt



                            IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 9072 OF 2017

          Mr. Raju Sanjay Ingvale                                ...Petitioner

                    Versus

          The Government of India and Another           ...Respondents
                                            ***
           None for the Petitioner.
           Mr. A. P. Vanarase, AGP for Respondent – State.
                                            ***
                                          CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND
                                                    ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
                                                 DATE     : 17 AUGUST, 2026.
          P. C. :

          1.                 In the present writ petition, the Petitioner seeks a direction

          to Respondent No.2 (National Highways Authority of India) to decide

          the representation submitted by the Petitioner on 21 st July 2017. This

          writ petition was filed on 27th July 2017. It appears from the

          proceedings that thereafter, the Petitioner has never remained present

          when the matter was called out. Hence, by an order dated 03 rd August

          2026, the petition was kept today under the caption “For Dismissal”.

          2.                 None appears for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is

          dismissed for default.



                    (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)                        (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)

          Shrikant Malani                                                           Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.