Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRI. ABHIJEET SHASHIKANT PATILversusTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, METRO CENTRE AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear.

Summary

The petitioner, Shri Abhijeet Shashikant Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Metro Centre and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called out. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The dismissal was pronounced by Justice Amit Borkar.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of the petitioner's non-appearance on the continuation of a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • non-appearance

Judgment

                                                                             32-WP-9075-2015.doc


                        Vivekanand
                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           Digitally
           signed by
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
           VIVEKANAND
VIVEKANAND RAJENDRA
RAJENDRA   BONDE
BONDE      Date:
           2026.08.17
           17:58:54
           +0530
                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 9075 OF 2015

                        Shri. Abhijeet Shashikant Patil             … Petitioner
                                    V/s.
                        The Special Land Acquisition
                        Officer, Metro Centre and Anr.              … Respondents

                        None for the Petitioner.
                        Mrs. P. J. Gavhane, AGP for the Respondent-State Nos.
                        1 & 2.


                                                    CORAM     : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                                                    DATED     : AUGUST 17, 2026
                        P.C.:

                        1.      None is present on behalf of the petitioner when the matter
                        is called out.

                        2.      Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of
                        prosecution.


                                                                    (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                                                          1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.