Bombay High Court
MAHARU TANGA PATIL AND ANOTHERversusSANGITA RAINDRA PATIL PAWAR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous because the underlying civil suit was withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order (Exhibit‑5) passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule in Special Civil Suit No. 32 of 2016. They contended that the civil suit had been withdrawn on 25 July 2019 by the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule. The High Court examined whether any relief could still be granted given the withdrawal of the underlying suit. Finding that the suit was already withdrawn, the Court held that there was nothing left to adjudicate in the writ petition. Consequently, the petition was declared infructuous and disposed of.
Issues considered
- What is the effect on a writ petition when the underlying civil suit has been withdrawn?
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal of suit
- infructuous petition
- civil procedure
- jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38418
9075.2018WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
3 WRIT PETITION NO. 9075 OF 2018
MAHARU TANGA PATIL AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
SANGITA RAINDRA PATIL PAWAR
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Thoke D.B.
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.J. Salgare
...
CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.
DATE : 24.08.2026
P.C. :
1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have
challenged the order below Exhibit-5 passed by the Civil
Judge, Senior Division, Dhule in Special Civil Suit No.32 of
2016.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Special Civil Suit No.32/2016 is disposed of as withdrawn on
25.07.2019 by the learned 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior
Division, Dhule.
3. In view of the same nothing survives in this
petition and the same stands disposed of as infructuous.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
JUDGE
SGA
Checking your session…