Bombay High Court
AMARJEET RAMAJORE GUPTAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GP AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition as the petitioner was satisfied with the SRA’s assurance of timely decision.
Summary
The petitioner, Amarjeet Ramajore Gupta, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the Competent Authority-10 of the State Revenue Authority (SRA), Mumbai, decide an application he had filed on 3 March 2025. The sole relief prayed for was an order compelling the SRA to adjudicate the pending application. Counsel for the SRA assured the court that the application would be decided within six weeks from the date of the hearing. The petitioner’s counsel expressed satisfaction with this assurance. Consequently, the Court found no need to intervene further and disposed of the writ petition.
Issues considered
- What relief, if any, should the Court grant to compel the SRA to decide the pending application?
Subjects
- writ petition
- administrative delay
- competent authority
- disposal of petition
Judgment
908-wp 9232-26.doc
ARJUN
MACHHINDRA
KADAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by
ARJUN MACHHINDRA
KADAM WRIT PETITION NO. 9232 OF 2026
Date: 2026.08.19
18:12:40 +0530
Amarjeet Ramajore Gupta … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
__________________________
Mr. S. A. Shaikh i/b Mr. Shafi Shaikh for the Petitioner.
Ms. Yashi Bhatt i/b Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal for the Respondent-SRA.
Mr. A. R. Deolekar, AGP for the Respondent-State.
__________________________
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 19th AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. The only prayer made in this petition is that the matter is pending
before the Competent Authority-10, SRA, Mumbai for deciding the
application filed by the petitioner on 3rd March, 2025.
2. Learned counsel for the SRA on instructions states that they would
decide the said application within a period of six weeks from today.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is satisfied with the
assurance given by the learned counsel for the SRA.
4. In this circumstance, the writ petition is disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Amk 1/1
Checking your session…