Bombay High Court
BHANGE ORGANIC CHEMICALS PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH DIRECTOR SANJAY BHAUSAHEB BHANGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed and the related criminal application is disposed of.
Summary
The petitioners, Bhange Organic Chemicals Private Limited, challenged a letter dated 22 June 2023 that denied their request for police protection while working in their company. They had earlier applied for such protection on 6 May 2023, but the impugned letter gave no reasons for rejection. The intervenor informed the court that the petitioner's company is now closed and arbitration proceedings are pending. The court observed that the petitioners had not pursued the matter diligently and were absent from proceedings. Consequently, the court disposed of the criminal writ petition and the related criminal application No.4091 of 2023.
Issues considered
- Whether the denial of police protection as per the letter dated 22‑06‑2023 can be challenged in a criminal writ petition
- Whether the petition remains maintainable given the closure of the petitioner's company and lack of diligence
Subjects
- police protection
- criminal writ petition
- disposal
- lack of diligence
- company closure
- arbitration
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41458-DB
925.23WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.925 OF 2023
BHANGE ORGANIC CHEMICALS PRIVATE LIMITED,
THROUGH DIRECTOR SANJAY BHAUSAHEB BHANGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
...
APP for Respondent-State : Mrs.U.S.Bhosle
Advocate for the intervenor : Ms. Priyanka D.Maske h/f.
Talekar & Associates
...
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4091 OF 2023
IN WP NO.925 OF 2023
…
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 04.09.2026
P.C. :
1] None for the petitioners. Though the petitioners
have challenged letter dated 22.06.2023 for not providing him
police protection, but it appears that under the application
dated 06.05.2023, the petitioners had sought police
protection while doing the work in their company. Admittedly,
the impugned letter has not given any reasons as to why
police protection was rejected, but the learned counsel for
intervenor, on instructions, submits that the Company of the
petitioner is now closed and arbitration proceeding is going
925.23WP
2
on in respect of the same. Even otherwise also, the
petitioners have not prosecuted the matter diligently and
today they remained absent.
2] Under such circumstances, nothing survives in
this Petition and the same stands disposed of.
3] In view of disposal of Criminal Writ Petition,
Criminal Application No.4091 of 2023 also stands
disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
Checking your session…