Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJENDRA VASUDEO POTDARversusTHE PRESIDENT SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA (PANDHARPUR) AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was held to be infructuous and was therefore disposed of.

Summary

Rajendra Vasudeo Potdar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, against the President of Shahu Shikshan Sanstha and others. The petitioner sought relief through the writ petition, but no substantive arguments or relief were advanced in the record. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after considering this submission, found that there was no longer any cause of action to be entertained. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • disposal

Judgment

                                                                     86-WP-9258-2025.doc



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 9258 OF 2025

Rajendra Vasudeo Potdar                                   ...Petitioner
           Versus
The President Shahu Shikshan Sanstha                      ...Respondents
(Pandharpur) and others

                                  ——————
Mr. Raghvendra B. Kulkarni i/b Mr. P. B. Kulkarni - Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. V. M. Mali – AGP for the State
                                  ——————
                                    Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                    Date      : October 07, 2026.
P. C. :

1.         The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner submits that

the Petition has been rendered infructuous.

2.         In view of the submission of the learned Advocate for the

Petitioner, the Petition stands disposed of as having become

infructuous.




 [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                           [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




SG Punde                             1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.