Bombay High Court
POPAT VISHWANATH VEDPATHAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the proposal for the petitioner to be placed under the old pension scheme must be considered and Respondent No.1 must decide within six weeks.
Summary
Petitioner Popat Vishwanath Vedpathak filed a writ petition seeking to be governed by the old pension scheme. Respondent No.3 forwarded the petitioner's proposal to Respondent No.1 on 24 March 2026. The High Court examined whether the petitioner was entitled to the old pension scheme. Finding the proposal duly recommended, the Court directed Respondent No.1 to take a decision on the matter. The Court ordered that the decision be communicated to the petitioner within six weeks of receipt of the order, and disposed of the writ petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is eligible to be governed by the old pension scheme.
Subjects
- pension
- old pension scheme
- service law
- writ petition
- administrative decision
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39680-DB
{1} 30-wp-9276-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
30 WRIT PETITION NO. 9276 OF 2025
Popat Vishwanath Vedpathak
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. T.G. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. V.M. Kagne, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The proposal of the Petitioner that he is governed by old pension
scheme is recommended and forwarded by Respondent No. 3 to
Respondent No. 1 vide communication dated 24.03.2026.
2. The Writ Petition is therefore disposed of by directing Respondent
No. 1 to take decision on the said proposal within a period of 06 weeks
from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the
decision to the Petitioner.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…