Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MANISH RAMJI DUBEYversusCHIEF LOCAL GRIEVANCE REDRESSSAL COMMITTEE AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner’s loss of interest.

Summary

Manish Ramji Dubey filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against the Chief Local Grievance Redressal Committee and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while respondents were represented by Ms. Anjali Helekar and Mr. Hamid Mulla. The court observed that, owing to the lapse of time, the petitioner appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • passage of time
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                                                        37-WP-9280-22.DOC



 JYOTI                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 RAJESH                                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
 MANE
Digitally signed
by JYOTI RAJESH
MANE
Date: 2026.09.30
                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 9280 OF 2022
14:47:50 +0530




                   Manish Ramji Dubey                                 ...Petitioner
                          Versus
                   Chief Local Grievance Redresssal Committee And Anr ...Respondent(s)

                                                           _______
                   None for the Petitioner.
                   Ms. Anjali Helekar, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
                   Mr. Hamid Mulla, AGP for Respondent-State.
                                                           _______

                                               CORAM:            AARTI SATHE, J.

                                               DATE:             29 SEPTEMBER 2026

                   P.C.:

                   1.      None for the Petitioner.


                   2.      It appears that, on account of the passage of time, the Petitioner has lost

                   interest in prosecuting the present Petition. Hence, the present Writ Petition is

                   dismissed for want of prosecution.




                                                                 (AARTI SATHE, J.)




                                                        Page 1 of 1
                   Mane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.