Bombay High Court
RUPALI ASHOK TAWARE AND OTHERSversusPRAVIN BABASO YADAV AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is deemed infructuous and is disposed of.
Summary
Petitioner Rupali Taware filed a writ petition challenging an interim order passed against her. During the pendency of the petition, the trial court issued a final order on the merits of the dispute. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the final order rendered the writ petition moot. The bench examined the procedural position that a writ petition becomes infructuous when the substantive relief sought is finally decided. Relying on the principle that courts should not entertain dead issues, the judge held the petition to be infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without further hearing.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition becomes infructuous when a final order on the merits is passed during its pendency
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- interim order
- final order
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38685
1 wp st 22491.26
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 22491 OF 2026
Rupali Taware .. Petitioner
Versus
Pravin Yadav .. Respondent
Shri Jaydeep S. Kadam, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 27TH AUGUST, 2026.
ORDER :
. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that in the
writ petition interim order has been challenged, however, during
the pendency of the writ petition final order has been passed.
Hence writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the statement made by the learned advocate for
the petitioner, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[ MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE J. ]
bsb/Aug. 26
Checking your session…