Bombay High Court
MR. KIRAN VITHAL PAI AND ANR.versusRNA CORP PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court held that a writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioners' request and consequently disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioners Kiran Vithal Pai and others filed Writ Petition No. 9593 of 2017 against RNA Corp Private Limited and others in the High Court of Bombay. The petition was filed under the civil appellate jurisdiction and was accompanied by Civil Application No. 2089 of 2017. On 22 September 2026, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they wished to withdraw the writ petition. The Court permitted the withdrawal and ordered that the writ petition be disposed of as withdrawn. Consequently, the accompanying civil application was also deemed not to survive and was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioners at their request
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- disposal of civil application
- High Court of Bombay
- appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
Sonali Mane 33-WP-9593-2017.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9593 OF 2017
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2089 OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9593 OF 2017
Mr. Kiran Vithal Pai And Anr. … Petitioners
Versus
RNA Corp Private Limited And Ors. … Respondents
[
Ms. Rutuja R. Chavan i/b Mahadik & Associates for Petitioners.
None for Respondents.
[
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 22 SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C. :
1) Learned counsel appearing for Petitioners, on instructions,
submits that Petitioners desire to withdraw the Petition.
2) The Writ Petition is permitted to be disposed of as withdrawn.
3) In view of disposal of Writ Petition, Civil Application does not
survive and the same stands disposed of.
Digitally
signed by
MANE
MANE SONALI
SONALI DILIP
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
DILIP Date:
2026.09.24
10:57:04
+0530
___Page No.1 of 1___
22 September 2026
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.