Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NITIN ASHRUBA DHAVAN AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court ordered the State to consider the University's proposal within six weeks and disposed of the writ petition.

Summary

The petitioners, Nitin Ashruba Dhavan and others, filed a writ petition seeking determination and fixation of their pay, invoking directions from a prior judgment dated 31 January 2023. Respondent No.5, a University, submitted a proposal on 14 February 2026 to the State of Maharashtra requesting that the pay be fixed accordingly. The High Court directed the State to consider this proposal within six weeks, ensuring an opportunity of hearing for all concerned parties. The court kept all contentions open but disposed of the writ petition without awarding costs. The order was signed by Justices G. S. Kulkarni and Dr. Neela Gokhale.

Issues considered

  • Whether the State of Maharashtra is obligated to determine and fix the pay of the petitioners as per the earlier judgment
  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to the relief of pay fixation through the writ petition

Subjects

  • pay fixation
  • writ petition
  • State of Maharashtra
  • higher education
  • judicial directions

Judgment

                                                                           402_WP_9622_2026.DOC


Shivgan
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               WRIT PETITION NO.9622 OF 2026

          Nitin Ashruba Dhavan and Ors                           ...Petitioners
                 Versus
          State of Maharashtra through Secretary
          Higher & Technical Education Department & Ors.         ...Respondents
                                            _________

          Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar, for the Petitioners.
          Mr. A.R. Deolekar, AGP for the Respondent – State.
                                             _________


                                              CORAM:        G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                            DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
                                              DATE:         24 AUGUST 2026.

          P.C.

          1.     Heard Mr Yuvraj Narvankar, learned Advocate appearing for the

          Petitioners and the learned AGP representing the State.

          2.     Respondent No.5-University has submitted a proposal/representation

          dated 14th February 2026 to Respondent No.1-State of Maharashtra, seeking

          determination and fixation of pay of the Petitioners, in accordance with the

          directions given in the Judgment and Order dated 31 st January 2023 passed in a

          batch of petitions by this Court.

          3.     Considering the averments made in the Petition and the reliefs sought,

          Respondent No.1 shall consider the proposal dated 14 th February 2026 submitted

          by Respondent No.5 within a period of 6 weeks from today, after giving an

          opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.




                                              Page 1 of 2
                                                                        402_WP_9622_2026.DOC



  4.             Keeping all the contentions open in that regard, the Writ Petition stands

  disposed of. No costs.



  (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)                                      (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)


          Digitally
          signed by
          SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH
NILESH    SHIVGAN
SHIVGAN   Date:
          2026.08.25
          10:52:34
          +0530




                                           Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.