Bombay High Court
ANJANABAI MADHUKAR CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR IT SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that Respondent No. 2 must decide the petitioner's representation dated 21‑04‑2025 within eight weeks of receipt of the order.
Summary
Anjanabai Madhukar Chaudhari filed Writ Petition No. 9629 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought a decision on a representation made by the petitioner on 21 April 2025. The Court examined whether the respondent, identified as Respondent No. 2, was obligated to adjudicate that representation. After consideration, the Court directed Respondent No. 2 to decide the representation within eight weeks of receiving the order. The petition was consequently disposed of by this directive.
Issues considered
- Whether Respondent No. 2 is required to decide the petitioner's representation dated 21‑04‑2025 within a specified time frame
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- high court order
- procedure
- disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37815-DB
{1} 42-wp-9629-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
42 WRIT PETITION NO. 9629 OF 2026
Anjanabai Madhukar Chaudhari
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through It Secretary And Others
...
Mr. Abhijit Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. M.K. Goyanka, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 2 to
decide the representation of the Petitioner dated 21.04.2025 within a
period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…